You asked for it, and now we are offering!
AXOLOM trunk FTM packing underwear is the first in a series of designs and styles that we are planning to launch. These quality trunks will securely hold any of our current line of packers. The interior has a top-loading pouch sewn along the seams so that it is invisible on the exterior of the trunk. This design has an extended pouch to allow room for most sized packer, giving the look of a natural bulge.
They come with a soft comfortable 2” wide waistband with our logo on the front and Axolom on the back. The trunk FTM underwear style is between briefs and boxers with a short leg.
This trunk style is only designed for packing, NOT compatible with STP devices.
Fabric: 95% cotton, 5% spandex.
We have sizes from Small to Large available at the moment. (More will be available in the future)
Small: 27"/30"
Med: 30"/32"
Large: 32"/34"
( *The sizing tag on the underwear is one size up. IE: if you order a Small size, the sizing tag on the underwear will be M. Please contact us before ordering if you have any questions as to what size to order.)
* 100% discreet shipping.
* Orders would be shipped out within 2 working days.
* Order can be canceled or changed before shipping. Please contact service team if you want to make any changes. ( Email: info@axolom.com)
* General shipping time:
-- United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy: 12-18 days.
-- Other countries and regions: 15-20 days.
* You will receive an email with tracking information when your order shipped out. Tracking info will update in 7-10 days when it arrive the destination country.
PLEASE WATCH AXOLOM PRODUCTS REVIEW VIDEOS ON YOUTUBE BEFORE YOUR PURCHASE! WE REPLACE MANUFACTURING DEFECTIVE ITEMS, BUT NO RETURNS OR REFUND ON WRONG DESIGNS.
AXOLOM Packing Trunk Underwear
Was struggling with other brand packing underwear bc of how small the pocket is but this one’s pocket actually makes me feel like it won’t go upward bc of my walking, I love these fr
The fault is mine for ordering the wrong size (UK is smaller than AUS) but the fact I can't get a hold of support for any kind of assistance is really sad, also it lacks a photo of the underwears interior where the pouch is. Its really unsupportive for the type of packer i got, rook i believe? No support in more ways than one i suppose.
Fit really well and comfortable
It's a good underwear I let you watch the video I made if you want to see it https://youtu.be/EZ65Z8YOcHU
Good design but they do run large, and could do with the pocket being tighter.
Hi Casey,
Size on the washing label is one size larger than the real size.
Yes, we are trying new fabric on the pouch.
Thanks for your feedback.
Im about to write a ridiculous amount of detail, because detailed reviews are what really helped me choose the right stp/packer, and I am really happy with this one. I’m 5’8” & 180 lbs for reference. I am non-binary and don’t reliably pass as cis male, so I prefer a very low profile bulge, like hint of penis, so I usually pack with a rolled up crew sock. I like to pack upwards with that, because I feel anytime I’ve tried folding it or using a packer that folds over at the balls/shaft junction it just looks super high profile and boner-y, and I don’t want to look inappropriate or draw too much attention to my crotch- the skin of a flaccid natal penis compresses but silicone does not, so I wanted my bulge to give the impression of a smaller than average flaccid penis.
I have reached the point in my transition where I got a weird & scary look for using the women’s restroom, so it’s men’s only for me now, but if I ever have to wait for a stall it makes me super dysphoric. My only stp experience was with the p-style previously, but I could never figure out how to carry it with me day to day, so i was willing to put in the time to practice a more advanced stp/packer device for the sake of being able to pass at a urinal.
I read an insane amount of stp reviews, and felt like the ‘medicine spoon’ style was best for me, (I didn’t want to navigate getting flow over the ‘hump’ of the balls/shaft fold, or deal with that being a weak spot that could rip) and I was looking for as small as possible. This all led me to the Godor.
I chose the XL because of the aiming assistance from the additional length, and because I read that the solid balls tend to make up the majority of bulk in packers, so I thought the additional length wouldn’t make a difference bulge-wise since the balls would be the same size. I opted for foreskin for visual aiming assistance and no enhancements for durability as well as general broke-assery.
I am ‘white’ but very olive/yellow toned. I opted for color #2 and it nearly perfectly matches my inner arm skin. I do wonder if it’s maybe a bit pale for a penis though? All the ones I’ve seen have looked a bit redder & darker than the persons’ skin color, although I have encountered a lot more circumcised than uncircumcised.
I adore this stp. It looks super realistic with beautiful veins and ball texture. The size looks very average penis, and the softness seems just right, it doesn’t fold super easily but has a very naturalistic flop to it when shaken, & the hollow shaft does a good job of compressing in a naturalistic way when packing. I do pack up with it, which I was glad to discover still works best for me. I can adjust the bulge prominence by moving the balls more or less in between my legs. I like this because it’s already pretty close to in place for use. I do carefully dust my inner thighs and the outside of the balls only with a little corn starch because one time I didn’t and there was a hint of chafe- the silicone isnt sticky per se, but it’s also not slippery. The gender euphoria is amazing.
I wear tight men’s boxer briefs with pouch space (and long legs, I can’t stand my thighs touching) and this has been sufficient to comfortably pack the Godor with no shifting. I’m glad I opted to wait and see if I needed a jock strap for it, because with these underwear I don’t think i do. When I pull it out for use, I pull my pants and shorts down just a little bit and pull the shaft over the top rather than through the fly. When packing, this is bigger than a rolled up sock, as I expected, but it just kind of looks like I have a pretty big dick for my size, not a boner.
USE: like I said I’ve only used the p-style a handful of times, but I am aware of my anatomy/urethra placement. I have not peed on myself even once using the Godor. Incredible. My technique is to spread my labia majora and firmly press the back of the cup against the back (taint side) of my bonus hole, which kind of stretches around the cup and seals. My urethra is pretty close to my hole, barely to the front of it. I hold the stp from the bottom of the balls with 3 fingers and use my thumb and pointer finger to aim the shaft, and press actually quite firmly upward, forming a seal. The solid balls prevent the cup from collapsing or folding, and the leak prevention lip helps immensely I’m sure. The hollow shaft is pretty big, as is the pee hole, so I’ve not even come close to overfilling it, although my stream is pretty weak. The raised edge on the shaft side of the cup touches my t-dick while I do this, so I could see the pleasure ridges on some of the other models being effective.
Overall I have zero complaints about the quality and design of the Godor XL. It’s 100% perfect for what I want from it. Thanks Axolom, amazing product, easy to navigate website, high quality, fast shipping, and great value for the price. I’ll try and remember to come back and comment on durability once I’ve been using it for a while.
I'm almost mad I waited so long to pull the trigger. This is the best packer I have EVER had. 5 stars! Do not be like me, waiting around... Pull the trigger!
AXOLOM Pico Plus FTM Packer - 2.8" Shaft Cut Version
It could have just been my anatomy, but I could never get this to work after over a month of trying. I could use it without leaks at home without clothes and underwear, but normal public use was impossible. It’s also too flimsy to use with the flexit harness; the cup and top of the shaft both just collapse. That should probably be mentioned somewhere in the description.